| + |
sphingosine 1-phosphate(1-) | up-regulates activity 
chemical activation
|
S1PR3 |
0.8 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257579 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
sphingosine 1-phosphate(1-) | up-regulates activity
chemical activation
|
S1PR2 |
0.8 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257578 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
|
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
sphingosine 1-phosphate(1-) | up-regulates activity
chemical activation
|
S1PR5 |
0.8 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257580 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
sphingosine 1-phosphate(1-) | up-regulates activity
chemical activation
|
S1PR1 |
0.8 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257577 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
3.0
sphingosine 1-phosphate(1-)