| + |
5-(2-propoxyphenyl)-2,3-dihydrotriazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidin-7-one | up-regulates activity 
chemical activation
|
GPR35 |
0.8 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257506 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
GPR35 | up-regulates activity
binding
|
GNAI1 |
0.2 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-256717 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
GPR35 | up-regulates activity
binding
|
GNAI3 |
0.2 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-256860 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
GPR35 | up-regulates activity
binding
|
GNA12 |
0.2 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-281587 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31142646 |
Here, we directly assess coupling between 14 representative GPCRs and 16 Gα subunits, including one wild-type Gα subunit from each of the four families and 12 chimeras with exchanged C termini. We use a sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay that provides control over both ligand and nucleotide binding, and allows direct comparison across G protein families. We find that the Gs- and Gq-coupled receptors we studied are relatively promiscuous and always couple to some extent to Gi1 heterotrimers. In contrast, Gi-coupled receptors are more selective. Our results with Gα subunit chimeras show that the Gα C terminus is important for coupling selectivity, but no more so than the Gα subunit core. |
|
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257204 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
2 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
GPR35 | up-regulates activity
binding
|
GNA13 |
0.2 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257283 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
GPR35 | up-regulates activity
binding
|
GNAZ |
0.2 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-257112 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
| + |
GPR35 | up-regulates activity
binding
|
GNAO1 |
0.248 |
| Identifier |
Residue |
Sequence |
Organism |
Cell Line |
| SIGNOR-256996 |
|
|
Homo sapiens |
HEK-293A Cell |
| pmid |
sentence |
| 31160049 |
Here we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique G alpha subunit C-termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric G alpha subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11- and G12/13- signaling. | We defined positive coupling if any member of the subfamily scored LogRAi ≥ -1 and negative coupling if all of the members scored LogRAi < -1 (Figure 3A-B). ROC analysis gives AUC = 0.78 (Figure S4A) when considering high-confidence known coupling data and suggested a threshold of LogRAi ≥ -1.0 for defining true couplings. | The score associated to this interaction has a LogRAi ≥ -1.0. |
|
| Publications: |
1 |
Organism: |
Homo Sapiens |
4.0
GPR35
- 
- 